Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish “holocaust” and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the “survivors”? Because it “dishonors the dead”? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble.- Gerard Menuhin, TELL THE TRUTH & SHAME THE DEVIL, p.305
There should be no "historical facts" who needs the protection of law to stand firm - a historical event that is true can stand on its own merits. The story of what happened to the Jews during WWII can not stand on its own merits; it requires imprisonment of researchers; imprisonment of individuals who question aspects of it; it feels it necessary to utilize torture to get a confession out of those who served in those fateful years; it required several foul show trials to establish itself as "proven history".- Franz Holtzhäuser, "Back on track", Holocaust History Archive, 2007
Jim Rizoli interviews Germar Rudolf (2015)
Horst Mahler: Cry for Help!
In 1946 the Allied Military Tribunal at Nuremberg declared itself to be an instrument of “a continuation of the war effort of the Allied nations” against Germany – IMT, XIX, p. 397.
To this day courts in Germany are bound by any of the tribunal’s statements, as codified in the 4+2 treaties of 1990, and cannot challenge their validity. However, this makes a mockery of Germany’s Basic Law (Grundgesetz) that has enshrined “freedom of opinion” as one of its pillars – Section 5.
And so in order to circumvent Section 5 of the Basic Law, Section 130 of the Criminal Law (Strafgesetzbuch) was enacted, which enables authorities to put on trial anybody who disputes the holocaust hypothesis. This “specific Holocaust law” also offends against the UN’s Universal Declaration Of Human Rights as well as the Declaration of the United Nations Council for Human Rights 2011, which states that, “publication of opinions about historical facts are not to be penalized”, under any circumstances. Thus the German courts still act in “continuation of the war effort of the Allied nations” of World War 2.
Lawyer Horst Mahler was convicted to 10 years and five months in prison for the non-violent assertion of an historical thesis, thereby allegedly violating §130 on three counts.
Horst Mahler is 79 years old and has been imprisoned since 2009. Without a doubt Horst Mahler certainly belongs to Germany’s most educated and most powerful contemporary thinkers and philosophers.
It is owing to his intellect, his wealth of ideas and his courage that he was considered to be a danger to the political establishment and that he needed to be locked away for the rest of his life.
In contrast the imprisoned Chinese dissident, Liu Xiaobo, has been awarded the Nobel Prize for Peace!
During his time in prison Horst Mahler’s health was so badly neglected by the prison authorities that he had to be placed in intensive medical care where it was decided that his left leg was to be amputated. This has done nothing to improve his position however. At this point his health has now reached such a critical state that the authorities are preparing for his imminent death by making plans to suppress any resulting demonstrations by the German people.
It must be noted that Horst Mahler had applied for release on parole after completing two thirds of the sentence, which is regularly granted to any criminal after completion of half of their sentence.
Horst Mahler is financially destitute and cannot afford a lawyer to take his action into court.
However he did succeed in publishing a cry for help from prison:
For a long time I hesitated asking for help. But now my life is at stake.
My left leg has been amputated and the doctors struggle to avoid further losses.
Eventually one lawyer agreed to run my defence in court. However, since I am financially ruined, I cannot pay him.
Furthermore, my application for release on parole has to be funded.
In addition, upon my release from prison a certain transformation of my home would be necessary to allow for the life of a disabled.
Please help! Many thanks in advance!
BANK ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Horst Mahler is still in serious danger. We ask you to make a sacrifice for his rescue from certain death.
Please use any possible means to inform media, authorities and so-called human right organizations, and please forward this message to all of your contacts.
Truth is hate, to those who hate truth.- Germar Rudolf, Auschwitz-Lies. Legends, Lies, and Prejudices on the Holocaust, 2005
Persecuted Frenchman Vincent Reynouard in hiding again…
Persecuted French revisionist Vincent Reynouard speaks from hiding on April 24, 2015. Help if you can!
For more information about how to help Vincent, visit his site http://www.phdnm.org/. You can also reach Vincent directly via email@example.com. Don’t worry if you can’t write French, English will work just fine.
Sylvia Stolz “The Reality of Freedom of Expression” Full Speech, Uncut
Kladderadatsch comments on the CODOH Forum « It’s a great speech, and if they’re going to try to send Sylvia to jail for it, I’m going to do my part to make sure as many people hear it as possible. You can help too: spread it around! »
Description as provided by KZ Kladderadatsch:
The historic speech by dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz, uncut and fully translated. The speech they want to put Stolz in prison for, the speech they don’t want you to hear.
On 24 November 2012, dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz appeared at the eighth annual meeting of the “Anti-Censorship Coalition” in Chur, Switzerland, where she presented a speech entitled “Speech Forbidden, Evidence Forbidden, Legal Defence Forbidden: The Reality of Freedom of Expression” (Sprechverbot, Beweisverbot, Verteidigungsverbot: Die Wirklichkeit der Meinungsfreiheit). This video is a recording of that speech, complete and uncut. Previous subtitled versions circulating online as the “Full Speech” have actually included less than half of Stolz’s presentation. This version gratefully incorporates much of the subtitling of the earlier 44-minute version, but also revises that translation in places, in particular to bring out more clearly the legal issues that are at the heart of Stolz’s argument. As such, this new version is not only more complete, but hopefully more legally accurate as well.
In the speech, Stolz discusses her experiences as a defence lawyer for so-called Holocaust deniers in Germany, and describes the Orwellian system of state-enforced repression there which denies defendants (and their lawyers!) the right to explain themselves under threat of additional charges for the “repeat offence” of expressing a forbidden idea, even in their own defence in a court of law. Stolz further relates how the subject of the Holocaust itself has never been clearly or adequately defined by the German courts through the normal channel of judicial findings-of-fact in precedent decisions. Instead, the courts have relied on the arbitrary doctrine that the facts of the Holocaust are “self-evident” and thus in no need of proof, despite the obvious objection that the arguments of the “deniers” themselves clearly demonstrate that those facts are indeed contestable and thus cannot be “self-evident” by definition.
In the face of such abuses and absurdities, other lawyers might throw up their hands and simply walk away: Sylvia Stolz has the courage to call injustice what it is, and take a stand. Her speech is an extraordinary document of our times, a deeply moving call “to think what is true, to feel what is beautiful, and to want what is good.” Wherever you may fall along the ideological spectrum, if you believe in freedom of expression, this speech is a must.
And of course there’s one last outrageous twist to the story. On 25 February 2015, the German legal system heaped shame upon itself once more by sentencing Sylvia Stolz to twenty months in prison for “racial incitation” on the basis of what she says in this video. So watch and listen carefully and ask yourself . . . who are the real “fascists” here?
(Subtitles by A Friend and R J Tucker, with editorial input by Kladderadatsch.)
Subscribe to KZ Kladderadatsch!
Nowadays people don’t ask for references. They just Google your name. And if you Google my name, all sorts of horrifying things come up: Holocaust denier, Nazi apologist, supporter of terrorism. And no responsible administrator in anything, forget about academia, quite literally even the post office. And that’s literal, that’s not poetic. Even for a job at the post office, they won’t consider you.- Prof. Norman Finkelstein, 30th January 2014
There are no German authorities. The Federal Republic of Germany is a puppet-regime. The State of the German people is the German Reich. This was defeated twice by the western powers. The latter acted under the influence of the Jewish agencies. They are the winners of both world-wars. All-Europe and the white race is the looser. The puppet-regime is hindering me to go to Teheran because the enemy knows what I’ll say.- Horst Mahler in an interview with EL PAIS in 2006
Sylvia Stolz “Speech Forbidden, Evidence Forbidden, Legal Defence Forbidden”
Re-uploaded after the user account for the version I had bookmarked was deleted. (“This video is no longer available because the uploader has closed their YouTube account.”) There may be an innocent explanation for that, of course. But it may also be yet another case of intimidation against those who call for open discussion of the Holocaust story.
In solidarity with the censored, and in protest against the censors, re-up.
Courtesy of KZ Kladderadatsch.